World-class museums in Singapore, but definitely not a leader in fighting the dodgy global artefact-trade

I’ve blogged here about the possibility that Singapore’s multi-million dollar Tang cargo shipwreck-artefacts may not be exhibited in USA due to objections from certain academic/museum circles there.  

That has now been confirmed. The exhibition in Singapore was jointly done with Singaporean parties and the Smithsonian in USA, and was meant to travel there after the 1st show in Singapore. But no longer.

Straits Times’ Andy Ho wrote an article today (‘Academe’s exhibition of parochialism’) about how shortsighted the nay-saying American academics are (click ‘here‘). He also makes the point which I had made in an earlier blog-post: would the ethically-bound academics prefer for a sunken treasure to stay underwater and be at the mercy of looters, or be hastily salvaged and then be shown in a museum?

But that’s not the point of my post today. My point is that at least in USA, different groups have the balls and platforms to voice their concerns, no matter how parochial or unfair they sometimes seem.  

Now that the Tang cargo is not travelling to USA (and most likely not to European countries, as they too would likely toe-the-ethcial-line following USA’s lead), it will leave its current exhibition space at ArtScience Museum and travel to Asian Civilisations Museum. Has anyone in Singapore made any noise about ethical concerns yet? I don’t think so. We are too concerned with philandering starlets and broken trains to even bother with archaeological ethics…

On a related matter, Singapore is not a signatory to any anti-looting conventions/treaties with the United Nation, and we are also proudly one of the major transit points in the global trade in illicit artefacts. Of course the Sentosa Group that owns the artefacts will not get any pressure from the government for buying/owning this controversial cargo, much less having local academics/curators/lawyers protesting its display in Singapore.

I know that a few prominent Singaporeans (doctors, CEOs, and even some very senior public servants) are avid collectors of Ankor sculptures, Buddhist/Hindu statues etc, and most of them are happy to buy artefacts of unclear provenance and proudly display them at home for the eyes of the privileged few. And who’s there to stop them, since no local law has been broken??  

With all our world-class museums in Singapore, we are still a world away from being a global leader in being ‘ethical’ in heritage issues. Perhaps it’s because we have nothing in Singapore to be looted for us to care about another country’s stolen treasures? And/or because the trade in looted artefacts makes lots of money for this free port of ours??


Filed under Uncategorized

6 responses to “World-class museums in Singapore, but definitely not a leader in fighting the dodgy global artefact-trade

  1. Charlotte

    Singapore is also not a signatory to the anti landmine convention and on top of that we manufacture them! See Cambodia Landmine Museam’s FB page below and Think Centre’s article. Why we contunue to make and sell these horrible weapons is just beyond comprehension and any money that we earn from the sale is really BLOOD money! Makes me so ashamed to be a Singaporean 😦

  2. Pingback: Shipwrecks and Shark's Fin Soup | SEAArch - The Southeast Asian Archaeology Newsblog

  3. Anonymous

    What the hell is the point of this post? You are all over the place and nowhere, frankly. You are too much of a pussy to take a stand, as well. What was so “unethical” about the collection and preservation of the Tang Cargo – yes, it does seem a lot better that it’s safe in a museum here in Singapore rather than dispersed throughout the world among greedy, selfish collectors – although I wouldn’t begrudge the poor fishermen for looting the wreck to sell it to dealers….
    Grow some balls yourself, please, rather than shooting from the hip at anything and everything. Take a stand, and back it up with well-thought out, well-reasoned arguments, then maybe someone will take you seriously.

  4. Pingback: Singapore’s National Heritage Board’s collection-policy, and ethics, in question | 23princessroad's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s